How long to spend
Five to seven minutes per application. Less and it becomes a template, which shows. More and you won't have the stamina for the necessary volume.
In those minutes: read the posting, find where it overlaps with your experience, write three or four sentences.
What to write
First sentence — why you. Not "hello, I was interested in your vacancy", but straight to it: "I'm writing about the junior Python developer role."
Second — what you have of what's needed. One or two overlaps with the requirements, in their own words.
Third — the proof. A link to the project where you did it. Not a list — the single most relevant link.
Fourth — the practicalities. When you can start, what availability, city or remote.
That's it. Four sentences get read; ten don't.
An example
Hello. I'm writing about the junior Python developer role.
From your requirements I've worked with FastAPI and PostgreSQL: I built an expense tracker where those are the core — intake, storage, reports. It's live here, code is open: link.
I haven't worked with message queues yet, but I'll pick them up.
I can start within a week, full time, remote or on site.
Everything is there: the overlap, the proof, honesty about a gap, and the practicalities.
What not to write
- A retelling of the CV. It's attached; it will be read.
- The story of your journey into IT. Interesting to you, not to them.
- Apologies for lacking experience. They can see that from the CV.
- "Fast learner, willing to work for experience." Everyone writes the first; the second devalues you.
- Demands of the employer in the very first message.
On admitting gaps
One line — "haven't worked with this, but I'll pick it up" — works better than pretending to command the whole list. Anyone experienced spots the embellishment immediately and stops believing the rest.
Admitting a gap, conversely, raises trust in everything else.
Where to apply
Not only to advertisements. Some roles are never published. What works:
- writing directly to a small company whose product you use;
- through people you know — the highest response rate of any route;
- in professional communities where roles get posted.
A direct letter to a company with no open role sometimes works better than answering a public advert: there you're one of a queue, here you're the only one.
What strengthens any application
The ability to check your claims in a minute. A link that opens. A description of your contribution written not by you but by the person you worked with. To someone processing forty letters, that's rare — and it gets noticed.
Хватит читать — пора делать
На CohortX можно найти команду под пет-проект и получить тот самый опыт, о котором спрашивают на собеседовании.
Похожие статьи
- Как откликаться, чтобы получить ответЧто писать в отклике, сколько времени тратить на каждый и почему пять продуманных лучше сорока веерных.
- Why nobody replies to your applicationsSeven reasons for silence — from the ones you control to the ones you don't — and what to do about each.
- Почему на отклики не отвечают: разбор причинСемь причин молчания — от тех, что зависят от вас, до тех, на которые вы повлиять не можете, и что с каждой делать.